Don’t Disrespect
Or Try to Fool Us
Pundits, politicians, and thought leaders are applauding the “rebuke” leveled at Trump 2.0 on 18 Mar 25 by Chief Justice John Glover Roberts, Jr. This is sane washing a crisis moment in the history of our country. Irresponsible opinions of this type must not be supported or allowed to stand unopposed.
Stay Alert
The clear text of the statement released by the Court and purported to be the opinion of its Chief Justice reads: “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision…The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
Statements like this are political theater. Their timing and essence are stunning to contemplate. Favorable reporting of them is worse than short-sighted or strategically inept.
Read between the Lines.
Take a moment to parse this lauded press release.
1. “For more than two centuries”
Since when has the Quisling Court cast an unbiased eye toward the WHOLE INTENT of the Constitution it is sworn to protect? Its infamous ruling in favor of the plaintiff in Trump v. United States mocks this false flag.
“It has been established”
During confirmation proceedings, at least three of the justices currently seated on the bench at best evaded and at worst misrepresented personal bias toward critical social issues already decided. This court ignores, attacks, and retires precedent. Its cruel mangling of Roe v Wade makes this verbiage worse than suspect.
“Impeachment is not an appropriate response”
Whether a charge of impeachment is “appropriate” in the opinion of the Chief Justice is not the point. The fact is that impeachment is a live procedural option for removing from public office persons in violation of their sworn oath to protect, preserve, and honor the constitution. Including rogue justices seated on the bench of the high court.
“To disagreement concerning a judicial decision.”
Invoking cover for actions and opinions of judges serving in the lower courts does not translate into exemption of members of the high court from personal or procedural misconduct.
“The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
Except at the level of the high court. There, a possible, let alone “normal”, process of complaint, review, and redress is a sad and distant memory. A disagreement concerning a judicial decision at level of the Quisling Court can be challenged and corrected only at one of the other two coequal branches of government. Which, at this time, just ain’t gonna happen.
John Roberts well knows the danger and the reach of his Court’s complicit and traitorous rulings. They have immunized the actions of a freely and duly elected criminal who joyously and publicly has crowned himself king of a nation that revolted against that very notion. The Heritage Foundation, Mitch McConnell, and (Citizens United v FEC) have seated a congress in thrall to the Trump 2.0.
I believe the Quisling Court is beckoning the White House toward its partisan jurisdiction and singularly destructive rulings.
The high court’s public “rebuke” of Trump’s march toward unsupervised and unaccountable criminal conduct in the name of America is worse than traitorous. It is suicidal.
When tryants storm past truth and justice, all that remains to abuse and lose is memory.
Protect the books.
Have a Pulse and a Memory
I urge every one of We the People dissatisfied with the results and consequence of Election 2024 to:
1. Be offended, not misled.
2. Insist upon your consent to be governed.
3. Resent being viewed as too stupid or distracted or intimidated to notice the fact and effects of Trump 2.0.
Our Quisling Court is full of prepaid conservative partisan minds. They have a brief, sordid, and far-reaching history of indefensible rationalizations for votes defying the will of the people, precedents in law, and the necessary balance of power outlined in the constitution.
Anthem
Understand the moment and its consequences.
Take responsibility for your actions. Or a decision to try to “sit this one out.”
We the People can run but we cannot hide from the implementation of the callous, cruel, and corrupt Project 2025 playbook. Or, we can resist. We can “just say ‘no’.”
The Power of One is indivisible and historically potent.
When enough committed individuals rise in unison and protest, tyrants fail and fall.
Acknowledge the chaos as in force and declare it unacceptable.
Let each of We the People unhappy with the results and consequences of Election 2024 every day in every legal way use our persons and our purses to deny, delay, disable, disassemble, and destroy implementation of the Project 2025 playbook.
1. Of our elected representatives--Demand identification of persons of good character and relevant experience to sit a Shadow Cabinet. Require them to daily protest illegalities, injustices and inequities proposed or enacted within their sphere of expertise.
2. Of ourselves—Keep a calm weather eye out for a true and actionable voice of resistance. Such a force routinely and spontaneously arises from citizens forced into acts of civil disobedience. When he or she or they surface, support their call for a return to law and order.
Persist.
Prevail.
That government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall not perish from the oh so precious earth on our watch.
We vote for presidents, not dictators.
I insist on my consent to be governed. I didn't sign up for this dictator/king drama and I want no part of it!